A couple of
days ago, I was writing a part of my forthcoming book (with the provisional,
and not very clever, title “Globalization and inequality”) dealing with war. You
have to have a section on war in today’s books because all of your stories
about convergence, divergence, global middle class, r>g and the like can be
totally swept away by war, and especially by a world war.
I then
remembered a small episode in my life, from much earlier times when the threat
of nuclear war really loomed large in everyday life. Like many of my peers, I have been strongly influenced by the Cold
War. We lived, until the late 1960s-early 1970s constantly in its shadow. I was
in elementary school when the Cuban missile crisis happened and I still remember
the feeling of dread that took over everybody. For sure, Yugoslavia, where I
lived then, was a non-aligned, although Communist, country and we did not
expect that the first volley of missiles would hit us. It was even unclear who
might shoot at Yugoslavia. But the fear of the abyss was nevertheless palpable.
Around that
time, we also studied elementary Marxism with its teleological succession of
socio-economic formations: primitive Communism, slave-owning society, feudalism,
capitalism, socialism and then, the blossoming of all, Communism. We learned
that every society had to go through these stages and that the ultimate and inevitable final stage
of all human societies was Communism. Then, living in the shadow of a nuclear cataclysm,
I combined what I had just learned about
the ineluctable advance of humanity with the threat of war. If all of mankind had
to reach Communism, I thought, then we cannot have a nuclear holocaust now since it would destroy the mankind before
it had acceded to Communism. Thus I decided that Marxism
provides a very effective rebuttal to any possibility of a nuclear war. My fears
receded. For, I thought, if there is a war, the scientific
study of where the mankind is going would be proven incorrect. And,
on that soothing note, I went to bed, sure that no world war would break out.
Now, almost half-a-century
later, as I was writing about the war, I realized how Marxism in that case
really fulfilled the essential functions of a religion. It is often said that Marxism,
with its succession of social stages and with the beliefs it engenders in
people, is a secular religion. But in this case it was more than that: it dispelled the fears of death,
like any “serious” religion would.
Now when I see the clouds of a nuclear war appearing again, and no longer believe in Marxist schemata nor in the ineluctable future of the mankind, nor in religion, there is nothing, I thought, to make me forget the fear of war.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.